Feb 26, 2018 - Nervous system The nervous system is the part of an animal's body that coordinates its actions and transmits signals to and from different parts. Download Free Libro Ajuste De Cuentas Vicens Castellano Pdf Editor. De cuentas, ajuste sun, ajuste de cuentas prado, ajustement, ajuste uv, ajustes de yoga,.
wihola.cba.pl› 〓〓〓 Marvell 88se9230 Linux Driver In Alabama What Age 〓〓〓
![Ajuste de cuentas mestiza y neblinna Ajuste de cuentas mestiza y neblinna](/uploads/1/2/6/2/126238717/134601008.png)
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2013 12:34:23 -0700 found 700975 linux/3.2.35-2, linux/3.8.2-1~experimental.1 quit Hi Maik, Maik Zumstrull wrote: >Any way to get some attention on this bug? Sorry for the slow reply. I missed your message 'Also happens on 3.8', probably because the subject didn't make it stand out in the inbox. Sorry about that. Please send a summary of symptoms to [email protected], cc-ing either me or this bug log so we can track it. Be sure to mention: * steps to reproduce, expected result, actual result, and how the difference indicates a bug (should be simple enough here) * which kernel versions you have tried and what happens with each * any relevant kernel log messages and when the occur relative to the steps used to reproduce the problem * relevant hardware information (lspci output for the SATA controller, full 'dmesg' output from booting as an attachment) The message [ 240.483211] md/raid:md127: Disk failure on sdg, disabling device.
Examples of bridge-based PCIe SSDs include the use of the Marvell 88SE9485, aPCIe 2.0 x8 to 8x 6Gb/s SAS/SATA I/O controller, and the Marvell 88SE9230. Qualified show attendees will be able to test drive their VMs in the Nirvanix Cloud Storage Network(TM) by taking advantage of a promotional offer of 1TB of.
Does not make this sound good. But hopefully the md/raid folks might have ideas for tracking the problem down further. Hope that helps, Jonathan.
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2013 10:06:58 +0200 On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 2:16 AM, Roger Heflin wrote: >lspci look like this for the controller: >SATA controller: Marvell Technology Group Ltd. Device 9230 (rev 10) >>4pt sata3.0 6gbit or is yours a different one?
Mine looks slightly different (included somewhere in my mail), but should be a device in the same family. >I have the issue also, I have eliminated all smart hits against the >disks and no incidents since then. Not a great workaround as such, first of all, running SMART against your storage is kind of recommended, and secondly, as I said, udisks2 will also SMART your disks occasionally, which you have to uninstall parts of GNOME to get rid of. >I have seagate 1.5tb drives on mine that had had the issues.
Suggests it's not something about my drives, as I have WD Red disks. Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2013 09:23:47 +0100 [ (text/plain, inline)] On Thu Apr 04, 2013 at 10:13:05 +0200, Maik Zumstrull wrote: >Hello Linux RAID and ATA people, >>I've managed to find a configuration on my home desktop where a >particular RAID array is barely usable. >>You can find my initial report at: >>>In summary: >>- I create an array across four disks on a Marvell AHCI controller, >which automatically goes into rebuild mode. >- Somebody (e.g. Smartd or udisks2 or me, testing) sends a SMART >command to one of the disks. >- The SMART command fails. >- The ATA subsystems freaks out all over the place, until eventually >none of the disks on that controller are responsive.
![Libro Ajuste De Cuentas Vicens Castellano Pdf Libro Ajuste De Cuentas Vicens Castellano Pdf](/uploads/1/2/6/2/126238717/414212209.jpg)
>- The array is dead until reboot. (Curiously, without data loss so >far. Kudos on the RAID code, I guess.) >>I've found the issue to be highly reproducible so far.
Things mostly >work if the array is not under heavy load (not rebuilding, no big file >copies going on) or I make completely sure nothing sends SMART >commands. I currently do keep real files on that array, but backed-up >ones, so I could wipe it for more tests if really necessary. >I used to have the same issues on one of my machines. The solution was to buy a decent SAS/SATA HBA (I went with the Intel RS2WC080, but see for a more complete list), which now works perfectly with exactly the same drives as before. HTH, Robin -- ___ ( ' } Robin Hill / / ) Little Jim says. //!! 'He fallen in de water!!'
[ (application/pgp-signature, inline)]. Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2013 10:58:46 +0200 On 2013-04-05 10:06, Maik Zumstrull wrote: >On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 2:16 AM, Roger Heflin wrote: >>>lspci look like this for the controller: >>SATA controller: Marvell Technology Group Ltd. Device 9230 (rev 10) >>>>4pt sata3.0 6gbit or is yours a different one? >Mine looks slightly different (included somewhere in my mail), but >should be a device in the same family. >>>I have the issue also, I have eliminated all smart hits against the >>disks and no incidents since then.
>Not a great workaround as such, first of all, running SMART against >your storage is kind of recommended, and secondly, as I said, udisks2 >will also SMART your disks occasionally, which you have to uninstall >parts of GNOME to get rid of. This reminds me of an old thread in freebsd-scsi, where a guy with some SAS disks and a SAS2008 controller would have his disks 'lost' if he used smartctl on routine, and could reproduce it reliably by spamming a disk with smartctl -a (but smartctl -i, and something else would not reproduce it). And he found that to solve it, he can change the 'disk tags' to much lower. I think 'disk tags' might be equivalent to the nr_requests in Linux. Here is the thread: >>I have seagate 1.5tb drives on mine that had had the issues. >Suggests it's not something about my drives, as I have WD Red disks.
>-- >To unsubscribe from this list: send the line 'unsubscribe linux-raid' in >the body of a message to [email protected] >More majordomo info at -- -------------------------------------------- Peter Maloney Brockmann Consult Max-Planck-Str. 2 21502 Geesthacht Germany Tel: +49 4152 889 300 Fax: +49 4152 889 333 E-mail: peter. Pic16f690 Serial Communication C Code 399. [email protected] Internet. Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 14:18:43 +0200 On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Robin Hill wrote: >On Thu Apr 04, 2013 at 10:13:05 +0200, Maik Zumstrull wrote: >>I've managed to find a configuration on my home desktop where a >>particular RAID array is barely usable. >I used to have the same issues on one of my machines.
The solution was >to buy a decent SAS/SATA HBA (I went with the Intel RS2WC080, but see >for a more complete list), which now works >perfectly with exactly the same drives as before. Calling that a 'solution' seems generous, but since it doesn't look like this'll get fixed any time soon, I decided to go the same way and just ordered LSI SAS 9211-8i. Thanks for the list, that seems like a very useful resource. Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 08:54:23 +0300 Looks like we are experiencing the same problem problem with Espada FG-EST14A-1 (88SE9230) and 3.16.0-4-amd64 kernel. The main difference is that we are not using md - but zfs with ssd cache behind this controller which gives high load too.
Send a report that. Debian bug tracking system administrator. Last modified: Mon Jan 8 19:; Machine Name: beach Debbugs is free software and licensed under the terms of the GNU Public License version 2. The current version can be obtained from. Copyright 穢 1999 Darren O.
Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson, 2005-2017 Don Armstrong, and many other contributors.